Committee of Conundrums Theory

The Committee of Conundrums Theory is a comprehensive framework for understanding the complexities of human decision-making. It posits that any problem can be solved by creating an infinite number of committees to discuss it.

Our research has shown that the more committees, the better. In fact, we've developed a metric for measuring the effectiveness of a committee:

• 1.0: The committee is just a single person. This is not a committee.
• 1-10: The committee has a clear leader, but is otherwise composed of individuals with conflicting opinions.
• 11-100: The committee has a clear leader and a clear plan, but is bogged down by bureaucracy.
• 101+: The committee has achieved a state of meta-bureaucracy, where the only decision made is to create yet another committee to discuss the first committee's plan.

Our research has also shown that the key to success lies in the creation of an infinite number of subcommittees, each with their own agendas and conflicting priorities.

Here is a list of some of our most notable committees:

• Supra-Conundrum Committee (Focuses on the intersection of conundrums and the committee of conundrums)
• Conundrums and Subsidiary Committees (Studies the relationship between conundrums and smaller committees)
• Committee of Conundrums and the Ether (Investigates the metaphysical implications of conundrums)

Stay tuned for more updates on our research and the development of the Committee of Conundrums Theory.