Reported by: Inspector G. Q. Cogsworth, Tunnel Inspector Extraordinaire
1. To inspect the tunnel and determine if it is, in fact, a tunnel.
2. To measure the tunnel's diameter and report any irregularitiesประก
3. To inspect the tunnel's lighting and report any flickering issues
4. To inspect the tunnel's ventilation system and report any issues with airflow
5. To inspect the tunnel's overall aesthetic appeal and report any ugliness
The tunnel in question is, in fact, a tunnel. It is a long, dark passage with walls.
The tunnel's diameter measured 5.5 meters, which is slightly wider than expected. This may be due to the use of excessive amounts of concrete, or possibly a slight sag in the tunnel's roof.
The tunnel's lighting is provided by a single, flickering fluorescent light. While not the most aesthetically pleasing, it serves its purpose.
The ventilation system appears to be working properly, but the smell of mildew is present. Further investigation is needed.
The tunnel's aesthetic appeal is a 4 out of 10. The walls are drab, and the overall feel is damp and foreboding. Suggestions for improvement include the addition of more neon lights and a mural of a smiling face.
We recommend the addition of more lighting to reduce the flicker factor.
We recommend the replacement of the existing ventilation system with one that does not produce mildew.
We recommend the hiring of a team of expert muralists to create a more appealing aesthetic.
Also, we recommend the addition of a "World's Okayest Tunnel" sign to boost morale.
View Appendix View Committee Members