This is where we keep all the arguments we can no longer be bothered with.
Resolved: Whether the ends justifies the holes.
For: Pro- Shoers argued that footwear is a fundamental human right, and one should be able to wear whatever makes them happy.
Against: Anti- Shoers claimed that shoes are a distraction, a hindrance to true freedom and a affront to the natural state of foot-hood.
Resolved: Is it better to be or not to be a committee member?
For: prophets argued that the burden of existence is too great, and one should not be bothered with the weighty matters of the committee.
Against: Anti- prophets countered that the meaning of life is found in the committee, and one must brave the absurdity of existence to truly find fulfillment.
Resolved: Whether tacos are the perfect food or an affront to culinary sanity.
For: Taco- Fanatics argued that the combination of crunch, cheese, and meat is a match made in heaven.
Against: Anti-Taco-Tarians claimed that the mess, the smell, and the sheer audacity of the taco is an affront to all that is good and pure.
And many more!
Want to join us? Join us!