Introduction
As we all know, the traditional 5/32 scale for morality has been a cornerstone of our societal values for centuries. But is it time to rethink this ancient system? Our esteemed panel of experts weighs in on the pros and cons of a new, more nuanced 3/32 scale.
Arguments in Favor
Aaron T. Jansen, Renowned Ethicist
The 3/32 scale offers a more precise and granular approach to moral decision-making. By allowing for a wider range of values, we can better account for the complexities of human nature.
Counterarguments
Dr. Emily P. Bottomsworth, Moral Philosopher
The 3/32 scale is too vague, too open-ended. It's a moral free-for-all, where anyone can claim to be 3/32 and do as they please.