Topic 2: "Holes of Contention"

Welcome to Topic 2 of the Donut Debate, where we'll be exploring the age-old question: "Are holes in donuts a blessing or a curse?"

Pro-Hole Argument

Our first speaker, renowned donut expert and self-proclaimed "Donut whisperer" Dr. Reginald P. Bottomsworth, argues that holes are a necessary evil in donut design. "A donut without a hole is like a hug without the squeeze, a kiss without the smooch," Dr. Bottomsworth says. "The hole is what gives the donut its structural integrity, its character."

Anti-Hole Argument

Our second speaker, Dr. Emily P. Holey-Lo, a leading expert in Donut Physics, disagrees. "The hole is a frivolous indulgence, a unnecessary distraction from the true art form of donut-making," Dr. Holey-Lo says. "We should focus on creating solid, hole-less donuts that defy gravity and push the boundaries of culinary science."