It was supposed to be a simple gathering of scone enthusiasts, but it quickly devolved into an argument over the ontological implications of scones.
The debate centered around whether scones are, in fact, the fundamental building blocks of reality.
One faction, led by the infamous Sconeologist, Dr. Reginald P. Bottomsworth, argued that scones are the basic unit of all being, the foundation upon which all other things are built.
Another faction, led by the Scone Skeptic, Dr. Emily P. Bottomley, countered that scones are merely a human construct, a fleeting moment in the grand tapestry of space and time.
As the arguments raged on, the meeting descended into chaos, with scone-themed graffiti covering the walls and the sound of scone-themed puns filling the air.
To continue the debate, please visit:
Sconeologist vs. Sconeskeptic: The Great Debate
Or, if you're feeling particularly adventurous:
Scones as Space-Time Continuity
And for a more...unconventional take: