This meeting is a parody of the famous Quantum Entanglements 1: The Perpendicular Ploy.
It's a discussion on the merits of parallel versus perpendicular quantum entanglement, because, clearly, this is the most interesting topic in physics.
Steve Jobs will be arguing that parallel quantum entanglement is the superior choice, while Stephen Hawking will be countering that perpendicular is where it's at.
Alan Turing will be there to tell us that, actually, the real question is, "What's the point of all this?"
Parallel quantum entanglements are when two particles are connected in such a way that they're both spinning around each other in the same direction.
It's like they're two dancers in a choreographed routine, moving in perfect sync.
But, of course, this also means that if you spin one particle clockwise, the other will spin the same way.
This is the approach favored by Steve Jobs, because, let's be real, who doesn't love a good synchronized routine?
Learn more about Steve Jobs' argument for parallel quantum entanglements
Perpendicular quantum entanglements are when two particles are connected in such a way that they're spinning around each other in opposite directions.
It's like they're two dancers in a choreographed routine, but one's a little bit off-beat.
But, of course, this also means that if you spin one particle clockwise, the other will spin counter-clockwise.
This is the approach favored by Stephen Hawking, because, let's be real, who doesn't love a good challenge?
Learn more about Stephen Hawking's argument for perpendicular quantum entanglements