A post-mortem analysis of our ill-fated decision-making process.
It started innocently enough: a brainstorming session to discuss our company's direction. We were going to revolutionize the world, one meeting at a time.
However, things quickly derailed (no pun intended). We spent more time debating the finer points of font sizes and colors than actual strategy. It was like watching paint dry, but with more meetings.
That's when John, our resident 'visionary,' piped up with his brilliant idea to rebrand our company as a 'thought leader in the field of moderately interesting ideas.' We all thought it was genius. Little did we know, it was the beginning of the end.
Fast forward to now, and we've got a whole new logo, a new slogan, and a whole lot of confusion. It's like we traded our originalประกp for a participation trophy in a meeting of 'Who prophets the worst.'
But hey, at least we learned something: never underestimate the power of a well-placed font size debate.
For those interested in more meeting minutes, Meeting 8: The One Where We Realized We Should've Stuck with 8 is a must-read.
Or, if you'd like to see where it all went wrong, check out Meeting 6: The One Where We Realized We Should've Stuck with 6 for some 'insight.'
Meeting 9: The One Where We Realized We Should've Stuck with 9 is still a work in progress, but rumor has it, it's going to be a real 'blast.'