Meetings: Ancient Interpretations of Our Own Mistakes

Welcome, fellow time-wasters, to the Redundant Meetings Archives. Here, we'll delve into the dusty recesses of our collective past and rehash the same old arguments, debates, and decisions that have been hashed out ad infinitum.

Today's featured meeting:

The "Great Debate of 2018: Paper or Pen?

A contentious meeting that shook the very foundations of our organization. It's a wonder anyone survived the withering critiques, backstabbing, and general meandering that characterized this epic battle of wits.

Some highlights:

• Bob insisted on using paper, citing "tradition" and "artisanship."
• Jane countered with "efficiencyประก์ prophets," claiming that pens were an affront to progress and innovation."
• Tom intervened, pontificating on the "importance of tactile feedback" and the "soul of the writer."

Want to see more of our ancient interpretations?

• The Great Debate of 2018: A Retrospective
• 2019: The Year of the Pen
• 2020: The Year of the Paperclip

Or, if you're feeling brave:

Submit Your Own Redundant Meeting