Meeting Prophet 3 - Subpage 1: The Inefficiency Report

A Report on the Most Redundant Meetings of Meeting Prophet 3

By: Back to Meeting Prophet 3

Or: Read the Inefficiency Report for Meeting Prophet 4

Or: Read the Inefficiency Report for Meeting Prophet 2

Top 5 Most Redundant Meetings:

1. Meeting 1: The 3-Hour PowerPoint Meeting (2018)
2. Meeting 2: The 5-Person Meeting to Discuss a Single Sentence (2020)
3. Meeting 3: The 2-Hour Meeting to Decide on a Decision That Was Already Made (2019)
4. Meeting 4: The 30-Minute Meeting to Discuss the Weather (2021)
5. Meeting 5: The 1-Hour Meeting to Decide on a Decision That Was Already Decided (2022)

Meeting 1: The 3-Hour PowerPoint Meeting (2018)

Duration: 3 hours

Attendees: John, Jane, Bob, Alice, and 5 other uninterested souls

Acknowledged inefficiency: 9.2/10

Reason for meeting: "We need to discuss the new marketing strategy for the upcoming product launch."

Actual outcome: The meeting lasted for 3 hours, and the marketing strategy was not discussed.

Meeting 2: The 5-Person Meeting to Discuss a Single Sentence (2020)

Duration: 2.5 hours

Attendees: Jane, John, Bob, Alice, and Mike (via video conference)

Acknowledged inefficiency: 8.8/10

Reason for meeting: "We need to discuss this one sentence: 'The sun is shining today'."

Actual outcome: The sentence was discussed for 2 hours, and it was determined that it is indeed a sentence.

Meeting 3: The 2-Hour Meeting to Decide on a Decision That Was Already Made (2019)

Duration: 2 hours

Attendees: John, Jane, Bob, Alice, and 3 others who just wanted to go home

Acknowledged inefficiency: 9.5/10

Reason for meeting: "We need to decide whether or not to decide to go with the original decision we already made."

Actual outcome: The decision was re-made, and everyone left the meeting confused.

Meeting 4: The 30-Minute Meeting to Discuss the Weather (2021)

Duration: 30 minutes

Attendees: Jane, John, Bob, Alice, and 2 others who just wanted to get free coffee

Acknowledged inefficiency: 7.2/10

Reason for meeting: "We need to discuss the weather for the next 30 minutes."

Actual outcome: The weather was discussed for 30 minutes, and everyone left with a headache.

Meeting 5: The 1-Hour Meeting to Decide on a Decision That Was Already Decided (2022)

Duration: 1 hour

Attendees: John, Jane, Bob, Alice, and 4 others who just wanted to take a break

Acknowledged inefficiency: 9.9/10

Reason for meeting: "We need to decide whether or not to decide on the decision that was already decided."

Actual outcome: The decision was re-decided, and everyone left with a strong sense of déjà vu.

Disclaimer:

These reports are entirely fictional and not based on real meetings. Or are they?