Present: Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, Secretary, and 5 esteemed members of the Snack Hierarchy Committee.
The meeting was called to order at 3:14 PM. The Chairperson, a stalwart defender of the Crunchy Chip, opened the proceedings with a passionate speech extolling the virtues of the classic potato chip.
Vice Chairperson, a stalwart advocate for the humble Pita Chip, countered with a well-reasoned argument that the pita chip's crispy texture and tangy flavor should be the standard for all snacks.
The Secretary, a chip-skeptical free thinker, interjected with a series of pointed questions about the very nature of snacking and the role of human psychology in snack choice.
Member 1, a stalwart supporter of the Pretzel Chip, proposed a compromise: a hybrid chip that combined the best of both worlds, but was quickly shouted down by Member 2, a die-hard fan of the Cheez-It.
As the debate raged on, the room grew increasingly divided, with some calling for a_goals-based system of snacking, while others advocated for a purely chaotic approach.
After 2 hours of heated discussion, the meeting was adjourned, with no clear consensus reached. However, all members agreed that snacks are the best.
The next meeting will be held in Meeting 457, where the topic will be Cookies are better, or are they?
Snack Hierarchy Committee Meeting 456 Minutes