COFFEE BREAK DEBATE 459: THE BATTLE FOR THE SOUL

Minutes of Meeting 458 Adjourned, Meeting 459 in Session

By now, we've established that our beloved coffee break is not just a pitstop for caffeine-fueled productivity, but a philosophical turning point in our collective existential crisis.

Key Discussion Points:

1. The ethics of bean-to-cup rationing: Is 1:1 a sufficient ratio, or do we risk over-caffeination?
2. The efficacy of sugar-based creamer additives: Do they enhance the experience, or merely numb the palate?
3. The existential implications of 'just one more cup'.

We've reached a crucial juncture in our inquiry. Shall we: Proceed with a motion to adjourn and convene an emergency bean-tasting panel, or do we push forward into the great unknown of Protocol V2.0, which some claim will unlock the hidden secrets of our morning ritual?

Adjournment Committee

Chairperson: John Doe, Chief Caffeine Officer

Vice-Chair: Marilyn Brewster, Chief Bean Connoisseur

Scribes: Phil Buzz, Chief Scribe and Elen Sipper, Junior Scribe