Red Tape Reform Act 2019: Article III - Redundancy Removal Act

This article is the third and final installment of the Red Tape Reform Act 2019, a sweeping legislative package aimed at reducing bureaucratic inefficiency.

After two years of deliberation, countless hours of committee meetings, and untold gallons of coffee consumed, we have reached the end of this arduous process.

And what do we have to show for it? A whole lot of redundant regulations, that's what!

Join us as we explore the top 5 most egregious examples of redundancy in the Red Tape Reform Act 2019 and find out why they're being repealed.

Section 1: The Redundancy of Redundancies

Did you know that the Red Tape Reform Act 2019 includes a regulation that requires all forms to be printed in triplicate, just in case the first two copies get lost in the mail?

Why, you ask? Because, in the words of the esteemed Chairman of the Committee, "We just wanted to make sure that the form doesn't get lost in the mail, and we're willing to do whatever it takes to make that happen."

Continue to Section 2: The Redundancy of Redundancies (continued)
Back to Article II: Redundancy Removal Act Continue to Article IV: Redundancy Removal Act

Section 3: The Redundancy of Redundancies (continued)

And don't even get us started on the section that requires all meetings to be recorded in triplicate, just in case the first two recordings get deleted by the IT department.

But wait, there's more! We're not done with the Redundancy of Redundancies yet!

Continue to Section 4: The Redundancy of Redundancies (continued)

Section 4: The Redundancy of Redundancies (continued)

And finally, we have the section that requires all reports to be printed in both English and Spanish, just in case someone wants to read it in a language they're not fluent in.

And that's it! That's all, folks!

Thanks for reading, and we hope you enjoyed this thrilling tale of Redundancy Removal.

Back to Article II: Redundancy Removal Act Continue to Article IV: Redundancy Removal Act