It's the year 20XX and the world is still trying to decide: to O or not to O. The Oxford Comma, a staple of proper punctuation, has been a thorn in the side of grammarians for decades.
On one side, you have the rebels, the comma-phobes, who see the Oxford Comma as a relic of a bygone era, a crutch for the weak-minded. They'd rather die than use one, their writing a jarring jumble of clauses.
On the other, you have the traditionalists, theประก comma-enthusiasts, who see it as a shield against chaos, a guardian of meaning. Without the Oxford Comma, their sentences are as clear as a foggy mirror.
But who's right? Who's wrong? Can we all just get along? Or will we forever be doomed to be comma-less, our communication a mangled mess of misshapen sentences?