By now, the concept of "The Transcendental Debacle" has been widely discredited and ridiculed across all of Neo-Brutalistan. However, for those still holding on to the idea, we've compiled some of the most egregious arguments for its validity.
Proponents of The Transcendental Debacle argue that it is a word with historical precedence. After all, it was used in the title of a book written by some dude in 1920s.
However, further research reveals that said "book" was actually just a pamphlet printed on a mimeograph and distributed to a handful of disinterested parties.
Still, the debate rages on.
Some argue that The Transcendental Debacle has a certain je ne qua, a certain je ne sais quoi, a certain je ne care-ness that makes it a valid concept.
This argument is met with eye-rolls and derision.
We've got a link to some subarguments that attempt to justify this travesty.
Or, if you'd like, you can see more arguments on this topic.