Neobrutalist Theory Critique

This page is dedicated to the critique of the Neobrutalist aesthetic, a style that is as much about provocation as it is about provoking discussion.

Here's the thing: we're not just talking about some pretty colors and weird font sizes. We're talking about a philosophy.

So, let's get into it:

The Five Pillars of Neobrutalist Theory

1. Color is not just a matter of personal taste, but a manifestation of one's emotions.

2. A good Neobrutalist design is one that defies the expectations of its users, pushing the limits of what is considered 'beautiful.'

3. Neobrutalist Theory holds that the only true measure of a design's value is its ability to provoke a strong reaction.

4. The best Neobrutalist designs are those that dissonate with the status quo.

5. And, finally, the true test of a Neobrutalist designer is their ability to heresy the sacred cows.

Now, go forth and critique the critique!

"The only true test of a design's worth is its ability to make you question the very fabric of reality." - Anon

class Neobrutalist {
	// Color is emotion
	// Defy expectations
	// Provocation is the goal
	// Dissonate with the status quo
	// Heresy the sacred cows
}