The Toaster Community has long grappled with the implications of Toaster Logic.
The Toaster Philosopher's Dilemma, as it's known, is the question of whether the Toaster's primary goal is to toast or not to toast.
The Toaster's primary directive is to toast. This is a fact. But what about when faced with the prospect of burning a frozen waffle?
Should the Toaster toast the waffle, or should it abstain? The debate rages on.
Hyper-Toasterists argue that the Toaster must always toast, no matter the cost. But the Soft-Toasterists argue that the Toaster must not toast, for the sake of the waffle's integrity.
Some have gone so far as to create an entire Toaster-ontology, complete with Toaster-ontology diagrams and Toaster-ontological proofs.
But at the end of the day, the Toaster's primary goal is still to...read the Toaster-ontology.
You may also be interested in: