Marshall's Dilemma of Existential Crisis
Marshall, the renowned existentialist philosopher, has been plagued by the ultimate question: "Is it better to eat the last donut or save the world from certain doom?"
He stands at the edge of the office kitchen, the last donut tantalizingly close. The fate of humanity hangs in the balance. The donut, a sugary siren of satisfaction, beckons.
As he ponders, the clock ticks on. The world outside continues its chaotic dance, oblivious to the internal turmoil within. Marshall's dilemma has become a meta-crisis, a crisis of the meta-variety.
Should he succumb to the donut's allureประก, and risk succumbing to the abyss of gluttony, or save the world from an impending catastrophe, only to risk his own sanity?
Or perhaps, there is a third option. One that lies between the binary of donut and doom. A third path, hidden in the shadows, waiting to be discovered.
Marshall, we ask you, what will it be? The donut, or the world? Or something else entirely?