It was a typical Tuesday morning when the unthinkable happened. The meeting room was filled with the sound of clashing opinions and the stench of burnt coffee.
On one side, there was Bob, the self-proclaimed "Sausage King." He stood firm on his claim that sausages were, in fact, a fruit.
On the other side, there was Alice, the "Sausage Skeptic." She countered with an array of scientific studies proving that sausages were, without a doubt, a type of meat.
The debate raged on for hours, with neither side willing to concede.
And so, the meeting was called to a close with no resolution in sight.
But little did they know, the real question was not what sausages were, but what sausages were for.
Was it to be eaten? Or was it to be loved?
Or was it to simply exist in the vast expanse of culinary possibilities?
Only time – and perhaps a few more meetings – would tell.
Want to see where the sausage debate continues? Section 8: "The Sausage Paradox"
Or perhaps you'd like to explore the About section to learn more about this esteemed organization?