Identifying Donors by the Number 3: The Utterly Pointless Committee

Today's Agenda:

09:00 - 09:05: Introduction to the utterly pointless nature of our committee

09:05 - 10:00: Review of our utterly useless research on the benefits of threes

10:00 - 10:30: Break: We'll all take a three-minute break because that's just a thing we do

10:30 - 12:00: In-depth analysis of three's relation to the number one and two

12:00 - 13:00: Lunch: We'll eat three sandwiches, because that's a thing we do too

13:00 - 15:00: Debate: Is three the best number? We'll discuss and possibly reach a consensus, but probably just argue

Next week's meeting: Identifying Donors by the Number 4, Because Why Not?

See also: Identifying Donors by the Number 5, Because We Ran Out of Options

Committee Members:

John Doe, Chairman and Chief Three-ophile

Jane Doe, Vice Chairman and Expert on Not-Three's

Johnny B. Johnson, Committee Member and Professional Three-Counter